Activity Two - Heather's Metacognitive Assessment

Activity Two - Heather's Metacognitive Assessment

by Heather Smith -
Number of replies: 6

Hello all -- so I've uploaded a file below for your consideration. The assessment is designed in part to tackle what seems to be the perennial issue of students doing their readings but more than that it's designed to support students to reflect on their learning in a context of some resistance. It's all described in the attachment. 

I welcome all feedback and suggestions and if there is an easier way for me to share these ideas, other than the attached word document, please let me know. 

My best to you all from the east coast. 

Heather 

In reply to Heather Smith

Re: Activity Two - Heather's Metacognitive Assessment

by Derek Murray -

Hi Heather,

I love the idea of a collaborative review of reading strategies for academic articles. It's a nice way to both acquire the content knowledge by reading the articles strategically while also learning more about the process of reading an academic article. I think the activity will lead to the creation of a valuable tool and there are multiple layers of reflective activity, culminating in the one-minute paper at the end.

When reading your description I do feel that I would be compelled to participate, though I am a bit unclear about exactly how that would happen. What do you mean by "collaborative brainstorming" and "collaborative review"? Are you asking them to volunteer ideas vocally in the class? Or write things down? Are they in small groups? Individual? Large groups? Will you use a polling technology to collect ideas? These concepts seem somewhat vague to me, though it may be a disciplinary thing. Perhaps you have more specific directions that you will share with learners?

One thing I wonder about is the first part of the activity on January 15. You are giving them three main categories that they will work with in their brainstorming. I wonder what would happen if you did not define these categories for them?

For example, instead asking a question like:

  • "What do you look for when you read an academic article?"
    • Write down on sticky notes as many things as you can think of (one idea per sticky). ~5 minutes
    • Now, in your groups, collect all your sticky note ideas and arrange them into 2-4 logical categories. ~5 minutes
    • Now compare your categories and criteria with another group. What did you have that was similar? What was different? What would you keep from each?

You've then collected ideas and created the categories at the same time. You could then move to the part where you share your own process, and then revise as per your plan. I suppose you would have to be fairly confident that they will come up with relevant categories and criteria.

I hope this is helpful.

Derek

In reply to Derek Murray

Re: Activity Two - Heather's Metacognitive Assessment

by Heather Smith -

Hi Derek -- thanks for this. You're quite correct about the need to specificity in the guidance and I would typically do some sort of sticky note activity of sorts but your point is a good one about being explicit in the design. I also like the point about categories or I could have them line up 'steps'. Either way -- your suggestions are consistent with what I would do in class but your suggestions have more specificity and I appreciate that. 

Thanks! 

Heather 

In reply to Heather Smith

Re: Activity Two - Heather's Metacognitive Assessment

by Leonne Beebe -

Heather,

Thank you for posting your activity. It feels like there is a  group consciousness forming out there bringing in activities and questions we may have come up with before this week and now the answers are starting to show up.

Reading your activity in which you plan to help your class design a reading template reminded me of my last two classes. To help my blended first and second language Fundamental English writing class understand the writing process and the "five -finger format", for my first time, instead of handing out the grading rubric, we designed our writing rubric as a class activity incorporating both the writing process and format into the grading guide. Many had never heard of a rubric before, so I knew there would be confusion.  I asked them to think about one area where they thought they might have trouble or be confused and to write it down for sharing in our teaching circle. Later, as each student shared their reflection, I had a student write down the concerns on the board. Then, we discussed each concern as a group and decided how we could "student- improve" our rubric. After having this discussion, many of the students said they now understood more about what a rubric was and how to use it when writing their paragraphs.

After reading your and Derek's activities where you use the benefits of integrating reflection with collaboration to help students better understand and personally relate to the material being taught has supported my thinking on this type of activity. Thank you both.

As you have pointed out, many students seem resistant at first if they think it is just busy work; this may change once they experience the benefits of metacognitive activities in their learning success.  However, even when they know their "review and reflect" journals receive a percentage towards their grade, some of my students still do not write a journal.

Out of confusion comes clarity.

Leonne 



In reply to Heather Smith

Re: Activity Two - Heather's Metacognitive Assessment

by Beth Cougler Blom -

Hi Heather,

It was great to read through your activity idea in your attached doc; you've done some detailed thinking on this already!

I like where Derek is going with suggesting being more open with your prompt to students and finding categories from what they have generated after. I actually thought of the Liberating Structures process called Min Specs when I was reading through your writeup. Do you know Liberating Structures and do you think Min Specs could work? It could help you and your students come up with the "absolute must dos" and "must not dos" for reading an academic article. It might be easier to get them started with this than a large group brainstorm.

I'm curious about the template itself. Is this an authentic learning-based tool that you might encourage students to use every time they read an academic article? It feels somewhat tedious and might not be something very exciting for them to do. Is there a way you can have the students use social media during this process instead? You could get them to the same end result--posting about thesis statements, key arguments, 'so what' pieces and so on--but you could invite them in a way that they might actually more often do it in real life. Could they post on Twitter? On Instagram? Goodreads? Just a thought. I like where you're going, I just wondering if you can get more authentic to their real-life experience. What tools do they use when they are excited about something and they want to share the gist of it with friends? Could they do that here?


In reply to Beth Cougler Blom

Re: Activity Two - Heather's Metacognitive Assessment

by Heather Smith -

Hi Beth -- thanks for this. I'll dig into that link on 'min specs' a bit more because there is a fluidity to the process of reading an article that is contradicted by a template. 

A template may indeed not be optimal but the key for me is that the students get used to asking themselves similar questions of all articles as they move through the course. This provides them with the opportunity to practice the skill throughout and overtime and hopefully see that it's not so tricky as skill to learn. But there is something about the evolution of learning that needs to be included.

I see the value of the social media angle and open pedagogy and have used elements of open pedagogy in classes at UNBC but the Dalhousie students are a very different breed of student in my experience. I'm also not keen on trying to wrangle with them about privacy issues. I'm looking for baby steps for students who are used to stand and deliver didactic learning. I'm open to ideas on all sorts of fronts but I'm leery of social media given the particular context I'm facing. i could see it being adapted and adopted for one of my UNBC classes though. 

Thanks so much -- much to consider.

Heather 

In reply to Heather Smith

Re: Activity Two - Heather's Metacognitive Assessment

by Viviana Chiorean -

Hi Heather,

I appreciate the emphasis placed on the "why" of this activity, I think it was conveyed clearly and if I were a student I would understand the reasoning behind it. I hope this will minimize resistance, simply stating that this is an "essential skill" and that they can use this in future classes as well.  

I think this is a great activity, and if it's safe to assume that these students are geared more toward "scholarly" activities, I would tread with caution around social media. Being a high achieving academic myself, it took a long time to shift from formal papers to digital assignments and blogs as a student. Of course, now I am hooked, but that took years and many baby steps and encouragement ;)

I would present the information also in a creative format, perhaps in a more formal Prezi (https://prezi.com), in addition to a word doc. Some students may still prefer to have hard copies though to read as their time permits. Hope this is helpful.

Viviana