5. The Good, Bad, and Ugly

Not all rubrics are created (or employed) equally. Let's consider the benefits and pitfalls of rubrics when used in our courses:

When designed well, rubrics...

  • describe (or show) the expectations for quality of performance.
  • provide a guide or checklist for students to follow.
  • improve the reliability and validity of the evaluation/judgment.
  • increase efficiency of marking.
  • indicate the gaps in quality.
  • justify the score assigned to the performance or task.


At their worst, rubrics...

  • are unidimensional and flat, despite the fact the performance never is.
  • suggest that the sum of the "rubricized parts" equals the quality of the whole
  • list a bunch of invalid criteria that are easy to check-off but misaligned with the outcomes. 
  • shackle professional judgement.
  • decrease risk-taking by students.
  • act as a ceiling on performance and subconsciously communicate that there is no more improvement to be had. 
  • are not used by learners for learning.
  • are just more work for the instructor.
  • can fail to capture that "je ne sais quoi" in overall performance.