Discussions started by Stephanie Chu

Dear Colleagues:

A gentle reminder to please register for the Spring meeting preferably by Feb. 10, so that we can ensure that we have enough refreshments and packages for everyone and that a reservation is made for the group if there's interest in meeting for dinner. Details about parking, room location, etc. will be sent to registrants prior to the date.

https://webserver.lidc.sfu.ca/tep/spring-08/progdesc.php?c_id=163

We have a full day with wonderful networking and learning opportunities and look forward to seeing you there!

9:00-9:30 Coffee and Networking
9:30 - 11:30 UCIPD Member Reports (8 min./institution)
11:30 - 1:00 No-Host Lunch
1:00 - 2:00 Update on BC Campus Learning Together Meeting &
UCIPD Planning for the Future
2:00 - 2:10 Next Steps and Next Meeting
2:10 - 2:30 Coffee and Networking
2:30 - 4:00 PD Session - Dr. Lynne MacFadgen, Malaspina University-College
Effective Practices Research: Adult Learners

Best,
Stephanie

Greetings. First off my apologies for the delay in closing this discussion. I was away at a conference towards the latter part of the week and my internet wasn't working over the weekend. Secondly, to provide closure to the discussion: We covered quite a bit over the two weeks.

Defining Learning Communities & Examples

We started with defining different types of learning communities, their target audience and their purpose. For example, we identified communities which were created for students, such as within courses and their associated components and planned interactions. Discussions expanded to communities of practice, Wenger?s definition and how these communities meet the needs of working professionals. The lines between different types of communities are fuzzy. For example, students may start with a learning community within their course which becomes a community of practice as they become practitioners in their field.

We?ve shared a variety of examples of communities we?ve experienced or helped to ?build?, including learning communities which complement formal academic learning. The idea that we can look at communities through different lenses and models was apparent. We touched upon only some of the possible perspectives. The notion of learning communities isn?t new and was in practice before all the technical functionality we can have now existed.

Factors & Issues

 

Our discussions identified a range of factors related to creating and maintaining learning communities. Specifically, we delved into motivational factors (e.g. required vs. voluntary participation), presence (cognitive, social, and teaching), developing a sense of community among members and factors related to continued involvement ? for example, is interaction sufficient for a learning community? Do students require more initially scaffolding and planning around interactions to help ?seed? the community and its potential growth? To what extent does shared values, a shared interest in knowledge-building/exchange or a shared practice (in a particular field) needed for a learning community?

This also led to the identifications of roles within the community such as that of the facilitator, members, community ?host? and how roles may change over time with members taking increased contributions, ownership of and perhaps leadership in the community?s direction. Community-building techniques and recommendations for facilitating were shared. As well, how much ?planning? of interactions or events is needed to start a community running and when does it become too contrived?

 

The thread about, ?longevity of community? prompted lively discussion around the role of the community member and their voice in the community. People may come and go in a community and the longevity of a community is partly dependent upon its purpose and how it serves the needs of its members.

In Closing

This online discussion began as a result of two webinars on designing and creating learning communities. What struck me is that we speak about and hear a lot about learning communities and communities of practice (of which Wenger is a commonly cited source). Our discussions only touched upon some of the definitions, perspectives, factors and issues related to learning communities, and the resources made available through the webinars presented some models for designing learning communities, though more so for course or program-level communities. However, I found it very interesting and worthwhile for us to reflect, articulate and document some of our thoughts, experiences and perspectives related to learning communities and to share some other available resources. Thank you for your participation and I look forward to joining you in other discussions.Best,
Stephanie   smile


wink

Welcome to the student learning communities seminar. As indicated in the description, this is a timely discussion for some of us at Simon Fraser University, given that we've just participated a couple of Innovative Educators webinars about designing and creating learning communities. We will post links to these resources and later this week will add another archive from last week's "creating learning communities" session.

Increasingly, we hear references to "learning communities" and it is quickly becoming a catch word with an implicitly assumed definition. Lately, I'm not convinced that "student learning communities" have the same meaning for everyone. Let's work on gathering together our experiences and formulate a collective definition from which we can based our discussions.

How do you define a student learning community? What are your experiences with student learning communities? What do they look like and how do they fit into your teaching and organizations?
Off the top of my head here:

1. Tie in with Academic Relation's "New Faculty" orientation. I have a query to Sue Roppel about this from her side and the "New Faculty community" we've been developing.

2. A topic or sharing of resources about what's available at SFU. I did a presentation last year on:

A Richer Multifaceted Learning Experience:
Using available SFU resources

Learners benefit from different types of learning activities and an integrated approach to course components.  Various technological resources exist at SFU that can be used to support richer and more active learning and a sense of community among learners.  This presentation focuses on available resources and uses an existing SFU course and its instructional objectives as an example.  Time will be available for discussion and sharing of ideas and experiences.

It was well received in that no one who attended was aware of all the possible technological resources available to instructors (i.e. through the LIDC, ACS, and library) to aid them in developing richer learning experiences for their students at SFU. I have a .ppt and supplemental information with links which I could update for SCOPE if it's of interest. I'm also working with Cindy on something like this for the new faculty in Health.

3. Tie in with the LIDC website. I know there's not going to be much available on the site yet in terms of resources, but we could point to what's there and also set up an area to share resources within this community. Perhaps we can then take the resources from SCOPE and put them in the LIDC website in the future as well?

That's all for now...
S.   :-)