Violeta, From wikiepdia, on Appreciative Inquiry:
Appreciative Inquiry was developed by David Cooperrider of Case Western Reserve University. It is now a commonly accepted practice in the evaluation of organizational development strategy and implementation of organizational effectiveness tactics.
Appreciative Inquiry is a particular way of asking questions and envisioning the future that fosters positive relationships and builds on the basic goodness in a person, a situation, or an organization. In so doing, it enhances a system's capacity for collaboration and change. Appreciative Inquiry utilizes a 4-stage process focusing on:
- DISCOVER: The identification of organizational processes that work well.
- DREAM: The envisioning of processes that would work well in the future.
- DESIGN: Planning and prioritizing processes that would work well.
- DESTINY (or DELIVER): The implementation (execution) of the proposed design.
The basic idea is to build organizations around what works, rather than trying to fix what doesn't. The approach acknowledges the contribution of individuals, in order to increase trust and organizational alignment. The method aims to create meaning by drawing from stories of concrete successes and lends itself to cross-industrial social activities. It can be enjoyable and natural to many managers, who are often sociable people.
Simplistically, this is starting from the good things that exist, rather than some sort of deficit model on what is wrong, missing or lacking.
At to my other comment:
On the other hand I see some scenarios where there is a whole different attitude to education: a sense of gratefulness, engagement and value. (Sometimes missing on my own back door)
I have several close friends who have worked overseas over the last 25 or so years. Some of the stories are fascinating. Very poor and deprived settings by the standards of kids down the road from where I live - yet, overseas, the kids can be happy, vibrant, optimistic. Some of the kids down the road here - with tons of opportunities - basically lead spoiled, selfish and self destructive lives.
I also hear stories about schools quite low on resources in the classrooms, yet showing creativity with stuff, ideas and approaches. elearning can help here . . [Provided we don't merely import the words pedagogically unsound practices sometimes used in elearning . . .]
Sometimes the problems (social, cultural, resources, history) just seem so big as to be insurmountable. But in the same set of circumstances people respond quite differently.