What to bring?

What to bring?

by John Smith -
Number of replies: 14
What should we bring to have the best discussion possible? and, who should we specifically recruit to join us?
In reply to John Smith

cases?

by John Smith -
It's fun to get acquainted in general but it's always most juicy if someone brings a substantial "case" for discussion. I'd be glad to talk about CPsquare, it's history, current development, some of its directions, etc. I'd also be willing to share a presention that I'm making in a "best practice" session at the E-Learn conference about weaving online & face-to-face together from a communities of practice perspective.
In reply to John Smith

Re: cases?

by Alice MacGillivray -

I have at least two things on the go right now and would be happy to bring something on either if there is interest.

  • Wearing the SCHOLAR/practitioner hat, I'm researching perceptions of boundaries (in select literature and in a CoP related experience).  If I try to write more right now, it will be pages!  Depending on my focus when I return from Cape Breton, I may be about a third of the way through the work by then.
  • Wearing the scholar/PRACTITIONER hat, I'm in the initial stages of exploring a CoP for a public sector domain where the passion is high, workload is crippling, senior management is cautious and budget for support is probably nonexistent.

Alice

www.4KM.net

In reply to John Smith

Re: cases?

by Sylvia Currie -
These cases are fascinating!

I've been asked to prepare a case on SCoPE for the next iCohere Online Community Workshop so I imagine what comes out of that process will fit in well here. It will step through our research and design phases with a little more emphasis on the selection of tools to support community.

John, I've been following the work you've been doing with Etienne Wenger, Nancy White, & Kim Rowe on technologies for CoPs. Perhaps I could describe some of our choices for SCoPE through the lenses used in your framework. 
In reply to John Smith

Who?

by Alice MacGillivray -

Good question.  Shall we think about at least two aspects of this:  scope and focal points (e.g., persons involved in particularly intereresting initiatives)?

From the scope perspective, I have some questions.  There may be persons I know who are not CP2 members and who might be interested.  For those who don't know Royal Roads, it focuses on education for working professionals.  Ages vary from program to program, but we aren't talking about 20 year olds.

  • One is a Royal Roads MA in KM learner who has taken the CoP course and foundations workshop and may be coming down to the conference (and other KM learners/alumni might be interested as well)
  • Two are Royal Roads learners in another MA program who plan to do thesis work relating to CoPs.  They have not taken the CoP course or foundations workshop.  I'm supervising one; Etienne the other.
  • There MAY be a couple of Fielding students who know very little about CoPs, have complementary strengths and would like to learn more.

What are others' thoughts?  (BTW - I'm about to go out of town for some consulting work and will be back about Oct 4, so if I am quiet, it isn't lack of interest.

Alice MacGillivray

www.4KM.net

In reply to Alice MacGillivray

Definitely not just for CPsquare members

by John Smith -
My thought was that we would invite a broad group, certainly not limited to CPsquare or even only people who are deeply involved in communities of practice. Seems to me a range of experience and involvement makes for a more fun and illuminating conversation.
In reply to John Smith

Re: Definitely not just for CPsquare members

by Frances Long -
I think it would fun to sit and chat with others who work in this area, particularly with a drink in hand. Here are our communities that keep us busy, laughing and sometimes scratching our heads that I can talk about/contribute to a discussion:

knowplace and the various communities within knowplace
our knowtips annual conference february 22 - 26, 2006
moodle moot conference that takes place October 20 - 24, 2005


In reply to Frances Long

Re: Definitely not just for CPsquare members

by Elizabeth Wallace -

As Frances points out, there is a Moodle Moot in Port Alberni just the weekend before the e-learning conference, and it would be very nice if the participants in that could be encouraged to re-connect at the Rendezvous the following week. I'll be in Port Alberni and will certainly do my bit to encourage a Moot Reprise, if that's the right term. I'm also starting a new topic on the logistics of setting up the Rendezvous Meeting.

In reply to Frances Long

Re: Definitely not just for CPsquare members

by Paul Stacey -

Gee, I kind of like the sound of that sit and chat with drink in hand concept. :)

To provide a focus for discussion the ideal from my perspective would be short demos of each others online community spaces along with commentary about purpose, whats working, whats not, plans for the future, ...

Paul

In reply to Paul Stacey

Re: Definitely not just for CPsquare members

by Sylvia Currie -
That sounds good, Paul. Should we follow your outline to summarize our community projects for everyone ahead of the Rendezvous?

1. Purpose
2. What's working
3. What's not
4. Plans for the future

+ link to community site and/or demo ahead of time.
In reply to Sylvia Currie

Presenting a case

by John Smith -
How about the discipline of bringing some kind of issue or developmental question? So we're in the mindset of mixing a little bragging with some shared inquiry. Seems to me that might aim us toward the community sweet-spot we're aiming for.
In reply to John Smith

Re: Definitely not just for CPsquare members

by Sylvia Currie -
I've received quick responses to my invitation by email and expect to see more community types dropping in here soon. smile We'll have representation from the BCcampus Educator Community. There are also other SFU-based communities in the works and hopefully those members will be able to rendezvous with us. One in particular is a community for co-op students.

John's comment about including those who might not be so deeply involved in CoPs, and Alice's plan to invite Royal Roads graduate students prompted me to scope out SFU graduate students who may be interested in joining us. 
In reply to John Smith

5 minutes vs 10 minutes

by John Smith -
I propose that everyone plan at least on introducing themselves and the work they're doing for 5 minutes at the beginning.

If you want to talk for 10 minutes about a project in mroe depth, a handout might be fun / useful. I'm going to talk about the role of the technology steward -- part of a proejct I'm doing with Etienne WEnger and Nancy White.
In reply to John Smith

Re: 5 minutes vs 10 minutes

by Elizabeth Wallace -
I'm looking forward to hearing about your work, John, and to being with people who have depth and breadth of experience in building community. I'm conscious, too, that some of the people who have been attracted to the Rendezvous by this SCoPE community site may be generalists, as I am, and may only feel comfortable "lurking" and listening. I think I may put up my 10 minutes on eBay:-)