Chat log for LAK11 Guest Presenter: Jon Dron
Feb 15, 2011
01:21 - Jon Dron
systems
02:47 - George Siemens
It's Jon!
02:53 - George Siemens
yep
02:54 - ines cambiasso
yes
02:54 - Wolfgang (NL)
Yes, hi Jon
02:55 - George Siemens
we see you
02:59 - George Siemens
no nose picking
03:03 - Peiz
yes
03:50 - Doug Henry
Crude...
04:15 - Peiz
That was funny...
04:25 - Sylvia Currie
The slides on slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/jondron/learning-analytics-soft-and-hard
05:21 - Doug Henry
Maybe Watson could replace teachers...
05:55 - George Siemens
Depends how Watson does today on Jeoprady
07:44 - Sylvia Currie
CoFind: http://www.it.bton.ac.uk/staff/jd29/cofind/index.html
10:14 - George Siemens
you're up to 5! (last week I think it was still 4 :))
10:54 - Mark Gbur
to help administrators make program decisions
10:56 - George Siemens
anyone have suggestions for anything that is missing?
11:12 - Mark Gbur
I was thinking more on a department level
11:31 - Sylvia Currie
6. To help teachers to know how they are doing
11:45 - schawn
Help content to adapt to context
11:50 - George Siemens
what about policy/funders? i.e. decide how systems compare?
12:13 - dave cormier
Know how they're doing compared to what... that's the tricky part
12:14 - Mark Gbur
you can make a case that it is already being done for licensure in certain fields
12:14 - Adam Weisblatt
What about to tell learning functions know what is effective
12:41 - Adam Weisblatt
help learning funcitons know what to do next
13:00 - Adam Weisblatt
macro
13:22 - George Siemens
see this post as well: http://scope.bccampus.ca/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=16534
13:42 - dave cormier
huzzah! i love this question!
14:01 - dave cormier
what is a 'buuk'?
14:12 - dave cormier
no.
14:14 - George Siemens
use the green check mark or red x
14:24 - dave cormier
it 'could' be
14:29 - Wolfgang (NL)
Is a tool a technology?
14:33 - dave cormier
but it 'is' not
14:37 - Mark Gbur
depends on the end purpose
14:43 - George Siemens
@dave - is it the potential that makes it technology?
14:47 - Adam Weisblatt
technology is the method of using the tool
14:53 - Sylvia Currie
It is when you do something with it
15:02 - Mary McEwen
it's applying the stick to something that is the technology
15:04 - dave cormier
context george... as with everything else
15:23 - Nicola Avery
technology is a way of understanding how we are interacting with our environment
15:24 - George Siemens
@dave - but what's the context of context? I resist context as a factor
15:41 - Adam Weisblatt
This particular stick has a certain angle that might be useful for a particular task. Recognizing that use is the technology
15:52 - dave cormier
resistance is a fine context george
16:08 - George Siemens
Brian Arthur: Nature of Technology: http://www.amazon.ca/Nature-Technology-What-How-Evolves/dp/1416544054
16:14 - schawn
Recognizing that you can use the stick to perform multiple tasks (other than hosting leaves) is part of the technology
16:40 - Adam Weisblatt
@schwan agreed
17:28 - dave cormier
beatings!
17:33 - Peiz
lol
17:34 - Hans Poldoja
this stick fits very well with IEEE LOM definition of a learning object :)
17:50 - Doug Henry
hang a carrot on it
18:06 - Adam Weisblatt
Teach geometry
18:36 - Adam Weisblatt
how to create circles
18:40 - Peiz
Find water
18:49 - Adam Weisblatt
teach set theory
18:55 - Mary McEwen
binary system, and bifurcation
19:10 - Wolfgang (NL)
Make a magic wand from it?
19:14 - Mark Gbur
increase leverage, use for walking, ect
19:15 - Adam Weisblatt
performance art
19:47 - George Siemens
A bit like Gibson's affordances
19:54 - Adam Weisblatt
That is a learning opp
19:56 - George Siemens
(perceived, action potential)
19:59 - dave cormier
oh no. not Gibson again.
20:22 - Adam Weisblatt
Zen koans
20:41 - Andreas Link
hi, sorry to late ...
21:33 - George Siemens
agreed, Jon
21:55 - Adam Weisblatt
I thought you were being provacative
22:08 - George Siemens
steam engine, for example, is an assembly of numerous technologies, dating back centuries
22:16 - Tracey (Ohio State U.)
@Andreas... don't feel too badly. I had to step away from the computer and i missed the first 15 mins or so!
22:40 - Tracey (Ohio State U.)
I'm sorry! :)
23:07 - Sylvia Currie
pedagogy, for example, is an assembly of numerous technologies, dating back centuries
23:15 - Wolfgang (NL)
word technology comes from Greek techne "craft, skill"
23:18 - schawn
Is that the stick over your right shoulder?
24:01 - George Siemens
Jon has carefully planned this theme. He leaves nothing to chance
24:03 - Sylvia Currie
What's with all the sticks? :-D
24:30 - Adam Weisblatt
This is what I've been trying to explaiin to my clients
24:37 - Tracey (Ohio State U.)
LOL too funny!
24:43 - Tracey (Ohio State U.)
:D
24:47 - dave cormier
George you should hang out with Jon more... he's very open to others.
25:14 - George Siemens
@Dave - Jon is a nice guy. That's genetic. As you know, jerkishness is also genetic.
25:36 - Wolfgang (NL)
But are we not adapting technologies that were conceived for different purposes to use in teaching?
25:59 - George Siemens
see this recent presentation by Terry Anderson: http://www.slideshare.net/terrya/hub-de-summit-sydney
26:11 - Wolfgang (NL)
Like Second Life
26:25 - schawn
@wolfgang - sure - if there is perceived value. and possibly measurements of that value
26:28 - Adam Weisblatt
That question assumes learning is something separate from the other activities that we take technologies from
27:08 - George Siemens
see here: http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/kauffman03/kauffman_index.html
27:08 - Wolfgang (NL)
@shawn value often comes from creative inspired use
27:26 - schawn
@wolfgang AGREE
28:35 - George Siemens
knitting needles are bad replacement for Q-Tips
28:46 - schawn
but stronger than sticks
29:20 - George Siemens
great distinctions here Jon...
30:28 - Adam Weisblatt
Humans aren't alsways soft
30:36 - Adam Weisblatt
Machines aren't always hard
31:14 - Mary McEwen
Is the application of standards then by definition a "hard technology"?
31:40 - schawn
@mary - if you mean inflexible - hopefully not.
31:42 - George Siemens
"computer - softest technology ever created"..."assuming you're a programmer"
31:43 - Adam Weisblatt
Yes, and yet, standards can be designed with softness built in
32:16 - schawn
@adam agree - build softness into the standards
32:52 - dave cormier
@george so i guess softness is contextual
33:17 - Adam Weisblatt
So people actually hate some LMSs because they are soft. Too many bells and whistles
35:38 - Adam Weisblatt
MOOCs are crazy soft
35:50 - Deborah
I think 'soft' is nearer to 'elastic'
36:34 - George Siemens
Holist? or who-list?
36:39 - George Siemens
wholelist?
37:10 - Wolfgang (NL)
holelist? list of holes
37:11 - Mary McEwen
who's who of the wholist? :-)
37:44 - Adam Weisblatt
whole-ist
38:57 - Deborah
for teacher and students
39:07 - Adam Weisblatt
Right!
39:49 - Tracey (Ohio State U.)
So there is relativity to the "hardness" or "softness" based on who is using the technology-
40:51 - George Siemens
btw - for you twitterers follow Jon here: http://twitter.com/#!/jondron
41:10 - Adam Weisblatt
Learning groups beg for the flexibility and then are frustrated by that same flexibility...yet they forget the learner
41:26 - Wolfgang (NL)
Looks like soft/hardness reflects the amont of influence soemone has over the system
41:32 - Adam Weisblatt
Tools aren't evil
41:50 - George Siemens
LMS don't kill learners, designers do?
42:33 - Tracey (Ohio State U.)
I think designers who designer without the learner in mind--they "kill" the learner
42:44 - Wolfgang (NL)
Supermarkets have big influence over stuff on their shelfs, customers not.
42:48 - Adam Weisblatt
At least the learner dies of boredom
42:49 - Tracey (Ohio State U.)
or without the user in mind
42:50 - Doug Henry
Maybe the move to mobile will drive the change...
42:55 - Mark Gbur
@george I'd say policy requirements have more affect than anything w/regard to the LMS
42:58 - Peiz
@Tracy Agree.
43:06 - Nicola Avery
designers don't kill learners, learners are not a magic group removed from the design
43:17 - ines cambiasso
soft makes sts learn more
43:21 - dave cormier
@george Soundbytes don't kill ideas. People do.
43:41 - Tracey (Ohio State U.)
but who has more control over the outcome of the design? the designer or the learner?
43:50 - Mark Gbur
sure, but what we develop is based on what policies we need to support, but this is a vicious circle
43:51 - Amy 1
soft is loss of control for the instructor?
43:55 - Deborah
soft implies more effort for a good learning
44:21 - Nicola Avery
@Tracy depends?
44:23 - Adam Weisblatt
This chat box is a loss of control for Jon but he's handling it
44:35 - vjansen
Is learning shaped by the LMS
45:19 - Tracey (Ohio State U.)
if we involve the learner and the learner is willing to "receive" the involvement and become a part of the design... then yep. but many learners are not ready to receive the invitation to become a part of it
45:21 - Mark Gbur
@vjansen learning is shaped the creativity and commitment of whoever delivers the course
45:24 - Tracey (Ohio State U.)
and we can't force them
45:38 - hema
i agree so true
46:00 - Deborah
technology on e-learning has the risk that the student doesn't know which information is the correct
46:06 - Tracey (Ohio State U.)
nicole and I were speculating about who "kills" the learner
46:07 - Tracey (Ohio State U.)
:)
46:36 - Nicola Avery
@Tracey bad designers make life hard for learners
46:50 - Tracey (Ohio State U.)
i think that's what I was getting at earlier
46:53 - Tracey (Ohio State U.)
@nicole
46:58 - Adam Weisblatt
I love that Choosing when to choose
47:03 - Nicola Avery
:-)
47:20 - Tracey (Ohio State U.)
:D
47:32 - Tracey (Ohio State U.)
i like that too--choosing when to choose
47:38 - dave cormier
i've always seen bureaucracy as the most threatening thing to the learner... i see analytics as most dangerous as it becomes more bureaucratized
47:43 - vjansen
how do you distinguiosh between a bad designer and a good designer
47:55 - George Siemens
Jon's book: http://www.it.bton.ac.uk/staff/jd29/research/inandoutofcontrol.html
48:23 - Adam Weisblatt
Twitter 140 char is hard but url shortening lets you choose to take the conversation elsewhere
48:26 - Tracey (Ohio State U.)
@vjansen--i think that is a matter of opinion, but IMHO--one char. of a "bad" designer is one that does not consider who they are designer for
48:39 - George Siemens
http://landing.athabascau.ca
48:43 - George Siemens
but you can't really get in
48:49 - George Siemens
cause we chose for you not to
49:02 - George Siemens
unless you are an AU student or faculty
49:17 - vjansen
@ tracey... true although they are desinged for education, so where do they lose the focus
49:21 - Nicola Avery
http://jnd.org/dn.mss/design_without_designers_1.html
49:38 - Adam Weisblatt
Chunking makes choosing more flexible
49:51 - Adam Weisblatt
yes
50:21 - Tracey (Ohio State U.)
@vjansen - it happens all the time. people lose sight of the real purpose of their work
50:55 - K
Is assembly aggregation? And does aggregation stifle generative thinking?
51:57 - Adam Weisblatt
Waht does adjascent possible mean?
52:21 - George Siemens
@Adam: http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/kauffman03/kauffman_index.html
52:30 - George Siemens
it's a concept of evolutionary biology
52:36 - vjansen
@tracey true...
52:42 - George Siemens
you can't leap past what is possible now
52:46 - George Siemens
develop one area
52:48 - Adam Weisblatt
Thanks @george
52:50 - George Siemens
new possibilities
52:58 - George Siemens
develop another, a new range of possibilities
53:06 - George Siemens
any Questions for Jon?
53:10 - Wolfgang (NL)
Cool talk, Jon
53:10 - dave cormier
oh no.
53:12 - dave cormier
not george
53:19 - George Siemens
you take the mic, Dave
53:22 - dave cormier
that was awesome jon... v. thought provoking
53:27 - George Siemens
Please capitalize my name, Dave
53:27 - dave cormier
can't. taking care of children
53:28 - Tracey (Ohio State U.)
very interesting and thoughtful ideas, jon!
53:29 - Sylvia Currie
That was just excellent, Jon
53:32 - George Siemens
it shows respect
53:38 - Nicola Avery
great presentation thank you
53:40 - Amy 1
thank you!
53:46 - hema
thanks jon it was an excellent presentation
53:48 - vjansen
thanks Jon
54:04 - Adam Weisblatt
Great frameworks of ideas. Thanks
54:05 - edgaraltamirano
thanks
54:06 - Wolfgang (NL)
I'm wondering about component technologies. Many little hard bits can make up a soft technology, non?
54:20 - Deborah
a different point of view about learning... excellent!
55:00 - Adam Weisblatt
You need the LMS for infrastructure. This presentation gives ideas on how to adjust LMSs to make them work better
55:40 - schawn
you need an infrastructure - LMS may not be the ultimate infrastructure
55:55 - Nancy late
There are business drivers to be considered for sustainability
55:59 - Adam Weisblatt
What is the second tool you are mentioning? I couldn't hear
56:06 - Jon Dron
Elgg and Moodle
56:07 - schawn
LMSs happen to be the the flavor of the day
56:11 - Adam Weisblatt
Thanks
56:39 - Nancy late
And your helpdesk ability??
56:56 - George Siemens
questions from anyone else?
57:05 - George Siemens
Dave - does Oscar have any questions?
57:19 - Niklas Karlsson
What do you see in Laan? http://mohamedaminechatti.blogspot.com/2009/11/laan-vs-activity-theory.html
57:21 - schawn
we need the ability to build the infrastructure to assemble or build these assemblies
57:28 - Adam Weisblatt
How about LEarning Process Management and therefore recognizing that Learning itself doesn't need to be managed
57:56 - Jon Dron
I agree Adam - to a point: for some it is useful, for some, not so much
58:42 - Adam Weisblatt
The problem is that learning is an investment of resources. You need to justify that investment. LMSs then become a necessary evil
58:44 - schawn
LMS assemble on my behalf. No autonomy or freedom
59:04 - Adam Weisblatt
So it would be better to evolve the LMS than throw it away
1:00:20 - Ken P
The way UNIX evolved, yet it is still hard to use...
1:01:09 - Sylvia Currie
evolution doesn't = more soft..er hard
1:01:15 - Mary McEwen
I detect personal learning explosion when I want to dive deeper into multiple diverse threads of thought at once...thank you Jon!
1:01:16 - Niklas Karlsson
Thanks!
1:01:32 - Peiz
Thanks all. @Jon Thoroughly enjoyed this session. Miss your guitar playing and singing (telling us to blog every week). @gsiemens Thanks for the heads-up on Twitter. @Sylvia, Brighton is still the place to be. Come back to hang out more!
1:01:40 - Sylvia Currie
Thanks! Really enjoyed this session
1:01:46 - Jane
Thanks for your talk!
1:01:50 - Tracey (Ohio State U.)
thank you, Jon! and thanks George S for posting this to twitter so that we could join the talk
1:01:54 - Ken P
Thanks!