Scheduled Seminar Discussions
Showing 13 of 13 annotations by anyone with notes matchingtext containing "questions" in forum "Reflections and Next Steps: August 23-31, 2010"Scheduled Seminar Discussions:
discussion: Creating Seminar Landscapes (aka summaries)◀ | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creating Seminar Landscapes (aka summaries) by ◀ |
In that sense could the seminar facilitator also take on the summarizing role? | questions | Hilda Anggraeni ◀ | ||
discussion: SCoPE & The Pedagogy of Online Communities◀ | |||||
| SCoPE & The Pedagogy of Online Communities by ◀ |
How should a community like SCoPE work with other similar communities (- if they should)? What would professional development look like for working in intercultural online communities if this is an emerging form of practice? | questions | Hilda Anggraeni ◀ | ||
| Are we working to a particular - perhaps western model - of working online? How do we work together with difference in such open environments? | questions | Hilda Anggraeni ◀ | |||
| Also what do we as participants in SCoPE 'expect' in such contexts - from tutors, from each other and as learning outcomes? | questions | Hilda Anggraeni ◀ | |||
| Re: SCoPE & The Pedagogy of Online Communities by ◀ |
Do we do enough to acknowledge the contributions of SCoPE members? For example, would more formal recognition for SCoPE facilitators (letters, certificate of appreciation, etc) help to enhance their portfolios at home institutions? | questions | Hilda Anggraeni ◀ | ||
discussion: SCoPE & Web 2.0◀ | |||||
| SCoPE & Web 2.0 by ◀ |
The comment about Web 2.0 as "illusion of community" really got me thinking: "The contents are shared but there is no real sense of knowing each other or caring about each other". So much is shared, we all benefit, but I wonder how often we register WHO an interesting tidbit came from. And do we feel an obligation to reciprocate? | questions | Hilda Anggraeni ◀ | ||
| Having said all that, I guess one question is what is the place for Web 2.0 in the SCoPE community? | questions | Hilda Anggraeni ◀ | |||
| Re: SCoPE & Web 2.0 by ◀ |
what is the place for SCoPE in the Web 2.0 community? | questions | Hilda Anggraeni ◀ | ||
| Re: SCoPE & Web 2.0 by ◀ |
Is it distinct from a learning community, a community of practice or a knowledge-building community as 3 flavours of community often mentioned (to quote McConnell, 2006)? What do we mean by community? | questions | Hilda Anggraeni ◀ | ||
| Re: SCoPE & Web 2.0 by ◀ |
How can we continue to evolve SCoPE so that learning and knowledge can continue to emerge in meaningful ways - using these very same tools we discuss and experiment with and have brought into regular use? | questions | Hilda Anggraeni ◀ | ||
| How can we make this more visual so that we can have some overview of the many relevant hubs and what connects it all? | questions | Hilda Anggraeni ◀ | |||
discussion: Welcome to the annual Reflections and Next Steps◀ | |||||
| Welcome to the annual Reflections and Next Steps by ◀ |
What have you liked about SCoPE? What would you change? What are your ideas for future activities? | questions | Hilda Anggraeni ◀ | ||
| Re: Welcome to the annual Reflections and Next Steps by ◀ |
Is this one working because there are few others provided by institutions for example? Might it be seen for less virtuous goals as a device for marketing to get the name out there and then recruit people or exploit the participants as data? Alternatively, should we each have our own goals and purposes in a spirit of shared data? | questions | Hilda Anggraeni ◀ | Source | Highlighted Text | Margin Note | User |