One and All ...
encountering the world as it is rather than as it is modeled to be ...
...that is an interesting question ...
The footprints are at one level a complex model, referencing many, many people, texts, and practices, which could obscure our perception. But we try to work with the paradox of encountering the world as it is, while using the semiotic tools we have - by framing the enterprise (it is a 'continuous beta' or WIP) as a palette-for-description.
So, we try to attempt no more than to describe the way we encounter the world (of learning and much else besides) as it is - as learners, as designer, as participant researchers, as facilitators. We offer a palette, but its an open palette, as all palettes must be.
Use some of the colours/factors we have put on the palette, if they are fit for your description of your engagement with the world as it is. In the process you are ikely to find that you are describing yourself - your emergent self - too, and that can be quite unsettling. Ignore particular colours/factors, leave them aside if they are 'not applicable'. Re/Mix new concepts/colours if you need new ones, and share with us, please.
Latour sets us a challenge, i.e. to get the description right, in which case most of the analysis will flow from it automatically. That's a big ask, and I'm not sure if it allows enough role for the imagination, but its one way to think about it.