I like to mention about peer reveiw.It should be continous process.If your peer is your senior then it is much important.Then you can share his knowledge.If we can have stuctured questionnaire or something like that it might be useful for the consistent of reveiw.
In reply to Nalin Abeysekera
Re: Taxonomy of Collaborative E-Learning: Foundations
by Janet Salmons -
Nalin,
You made two good points. If the goal is knowledge exchange (see handout) then the review should be ongoing. By providing a checklist, rubric or questionnaire, you can ensure more specific content focus. If the goal is development of peer review skills, then it might be worthwhile to scaffold from a more structured review at first, toward situations where learners develop criteria to guide the review.
Janet